Funding is bloodline of every project or step in this mortal world. There
comes a stage when certain amount of funds seems fine for a certain project but
in fact, this may not be the case. This did take place in case of a study
commissioned by IBM. During a fact-ascertaining spree, it has posed number of
questions to respondent pertaining to preparation of their respective
businesses for an unseen contingency, in addition to ISO 27001 KSA cover. First,
majority opined that protective modus operandi in their businesses were getting
its due share in funding. However, it turned out to be insufficient, in fact.
This is happens because delving a bit deeper exposed that a given concern were
lacking primary set of defence mechanism , the absence of this fact was
negating whatever pittance or adequate resources were being supplied.
Such or likewise situation tends to take place only when Chief
Information Officer is not kept in the loop. According to the IBM, a leader in IT,
this office has to be an essential rather inevitable part of risk managing.
There can be other explanation for this sad turn of events; that is to say, the
very establishment is not clear about the notions that constitute inadequacies
in fiscal matters. Therefore, each organization has to be sure about what does
it mean by saying suitable amount of money.
One approach is to compare
the price of presentation with that of cure. An example can enlighten reader in
a lucid manner. The same has been quoted by IBM in the putative papers. The
instance of Aberdeen Group tells that in case data centre cease to work for
sixty minutes, the poor firm has to undergo the loss of one hundred eighty one thousand,
seven hundred and seventy US dollars, as per the aforesaid IBM report.
No comments:
Post a Comment